Rittenhouse verdict set precedent for rule of law

RELATED

That was quite a colorful story James C. Nelson wrote about the Kyle Rittenhouse incident and trial in the Dec. 8 issue of The Monitor, but to me it appeared mostly to not be based on facts. Contrary to Mr. Nelson’s argument, the Rittenhouse verdict set a precedent for the rule of law.

Since the trial was televised, I watched quite a bit of it and this is what I learned.

The presiding judge in the trial was Judge Bruce Schroeder, a no-nonsense person appointed in 1983 by a Democrat governor.

📧 Continue Reading

You've read 2 free articles. Enter your email to unlock 2 more articles and get our newsletter.

For unlimited access and premium features, explore our subscription plans.

— OR —

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Login here

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

LATEST NEWS